THE NAKED GUN (2025)

It all began in what was basically a shot-for-shot remake of a 1950's Airline Disaster film named ZERO HOUR starring Dana Andrews as Ted Stryker... and the "y" became an "i" and Andrews became Robert Hays... But the scene-stealer was one of three then-veteran actors who were famous for being extremely serious in extremely serious movies, making their otherwise deadpan humor funnier around such non-stop joke-a-second, modern-era hijinks...

Then, Leslie Neilson and the AIRPLANE writer/directors created a TV series that everyone seemed to like, but no one seemed to watch because POLICE SQUAD only lasted a handful of episodes... But there's a thing called "cult following," and SQUAD had it in droves... igniting THE NAKED GUN movie franchise starring Nielson partnered with another deadly-serious veteran actor George Kennedy... The difference between the reboot's modern-day-veteran star Liam Neeson and Leslie Nielson (or Robert Stack, Lloyd Bridges and Peter Graves for that matter) is the latter came from a time before affected sarcasm turned everything (from war movies to action movies to horror movies) into partial comedies... Which, back in the 1980's, turned Neilson into a kind of thawed-out neanderthal where the humor relies on him being stuck in a time he doesn't (or his character Frank Drebin doesn't) understand...But Neeson, whose done every genre under the sun ranging from historical dramas to semi-comedies to a barrage of high-octane action-flicks, simply understands too much, so it's really no big deal that he's a hard-nosed cop surrounded by a myriad of jokey gags... he can simply embrace or ignore them and it doesn't really matter... Meanwhile, some of the jokes are kinda funny, some are basically ignored, some even seem made to be ignored and very few make you laugh out loud since somewhere within this NAKED GUN reboot is a genuine detective drama that didn't want to be humorous at all... For example, had they cast Liam as the new Dirty Harry, there would be no difference, really... but neither would work because neither franchise should have been rebooted in the first place.

FRANKENSTEIN (2025)

When Mia Goth's Elizabeth visits muscular Jacob Elordi as The Creature, it's apparent that director Guillermo del Toro didn't really make FRANKENSTEIN to be more faithful to the Mary Shelley novel, but to basically remake his Oscar-winning THE SHAPE OF WATER... 

Which was originally intended to be another Universal Monster reboot for CREATURE FROM THE BLACK LAGOON... turned into a sexual romance between a very human woman and a brooding, misunderstood monstrosity: The problem is, neither creature is very scary... not enough to fit within the horror-genre as particularly promised herein...

And there are added elements that never needed explaining in James Whale's 1931 classic, like how Victor Frankenstein... played with intensely charmless charisma by Oscar Isaac... was able to build such an elaborate castle-lab to create/recreate life (involving a wealthy Christoph Walz as an expository afterthought)... An otherwise important process basically rushed through to get to that beauty/beast romance in what's semi-intriguing in the buildup but, once The Creature shares a few moments with his lady-friend (after killing sailors like a tyrannical ninja during the icy opening), it feels like a strewn-together 90-minute montage that could have worked better had it been a more "fleshed-out" (pun intended) Netflix miniseries, actually following the plot instead of merely covering the theme. Rates: **

Featured Post

THE NAKED GUN (2025)

It all began in what was basically a shot-for-shot remake of a 1950's Airline Disaster film named ZERO HOUR starring Dana Andrews as Ted...